Introduction
Dear Students,
I would like to share you the good news that our class won the competition between the English classes, so we have opportunity to organise a trip to London.
As you know, the requirement was that only the students can carry out the whole project, from the planning to the accomplishment. The floor is yours, and this webquest is used to share your plans.
Task
As you could read at "Introduction", this webquest aims at planning the classtrip in groups of four.
Your task is the following:
Browse the Internet and advertisements of travel agencies and
- choose an airline and a plane by which we could travel (round trip: so to London and back to home, as well)
- look for accomodation for 3 nights, and list 3 of them you would gladly stay at
- search for sights in London, and create a plan for programmes for our 4-day-long trip with 4 programmes for each day
- make a calculation: how much our trip might cost altogether
- create a presentation which you would present to the other at class, containing these previously listed points ( airline&plane, accomodation, sights, calculation)
Process
- First of all, we will have a class on Conditional Type 2 and Unreal Future forms in order to use these grammar structures during the completion of this task. (In the "Task" description you could see them in bold (might, would, could)
- You have 4 weeks to complete this task, but it is your responsibility to be ready for 11th April
- On 11th April each group will make a 10-minutes-long presentation in class (please, prepare either a Power Point Presentation or Prezi)
- After that, you will upload these presentations about the plans to our facebook group, and vote whose plan would be the winner.
Evaluation
The evaulation will be based on the following charts:
|
STUDENT |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Points (1 to 5) |
|
Use of the new grammar |
We always used the new grammar. |
We usually used the new grammar. |
We often used the new grammar. |
We sometimes used the new grammar. |
We rarely used the new grammar. |
We never used the new grammar. |
|
|
Use of resources |
We used at least 20 resources ( and listed them as references) |
We used at least 19-15 resources ( and listed them as references) |
We used 14-10 resources ( and listed them as references) |
We used at least 10-5 resources ( and listed them as references) |
We used 5-1 resources ( and listed them as references) |
We did not use any resource. |
|
|
Co-operation |
We always shared the tasks and kept contact contunuously. We were a perfect team. |
We usually shared the tasks and kept contact contunuously. We were a good team. |
We often shared the tasks, but did not keep contact contunuously. Our team was OK. |
We sometimes shared the tasks and kept contact from one week before the presentation. |
We rarely shared the tasks and kept contact only before the presentation. |
We did not share the tasks and did not keet contact at all. |
|
|
Efficiency |
We did an excellent job. |
We did a great job. |
We did a good job. |
Our task was OK. |
We could have done a better job. |
We did a bad job. |
|
|
Deadline |
We were ready on 11 April. |
We were ready 1 day after 11 April. |
We were ready 2 days after 11 April. |
We were ready 3 days after 11 April. |
We were ready 4 days after 11 April. |
We were ready 5 or more days after 11 April. |
|
|
Presentation |
Our PPt/Prezi presentation was colourful, informative, interesting and well-planned. |
Our PPt/Prezi presentation was colourful, well-planned, but not informative enough. |
Our PPt/Prezi presentation was well-planned, but not colourful and not informative enough. |
Our PPt/Prezi presentation was OK, but not well-planned, not colourful and not informative enough. |
Our presentation was not with PPt/Prezi, not well-planned, not colourful and not informative enough. |
Our presentation was not with PPt/Prezi and was short. |
|
|
TEACHER |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Points (1 to 5) |
|
Use of the new grammar |
The students always used the new grammar. |
The students usually used the new grammar. |
The students often used the new grammar. |
The students sometimes used the new grammar. |
The students rarely used the new grammar. |
The students never used the new grammar. |
|
|
Use of resources |
The students used at least 20 resources ( and listed them as references) |
The students used at least 19-15 resources ( and listed them as references) |
The students used 14-10 resources ( and listed them as references) |
The students used at least 10-5 resources ( and listed them as references) |
The students used 5-1 resources ( and listed them as references) |
The students did not use any resource. |
|
|
Co-operation |
The students always shared the tasks and kept contact contunuously. We were a perfect team. |
The students usually shared the tasks and kept contact contunuously. We were a good team. |
The students often shared the tasks, but did not keep contact contunuously. Our team was OK. |
The students sometimes shared the tasks and kept contact from one week before the presentation. |
The students rarely shared the tasks and kept contact only before the presentation. |
The students did not share the tasks and did not keet contact at all. |
|
|
Efficiency |
The students did an excellent job. |
The students did a great job. |
The students did a good job. |
The students’ task was OK. |
The students could have done a better job. |
The students did a bad job. |
|
|
Deadline |
The students were ready on 11 April. |
The students were ready 1 day after 11 April. |
The students were ready 2 days after 11 April. |
The students were ready 3 days after 11 April. |
The students were ready 4 days after 11 April. |
The students were ready 5 or more days after 11 April. |
|
|
Presentation |
The PPt/Prezi presentation was colourful, informative, interesting and well-planned. |
The PPt/Prezi presentation was colourful, well-planned, but not informative enough. |
The PPt/Prezi presentation was well-planned, but not colourful and not informative enough. |
The PPt/Prezi presentation was OK, but not well-planned, not colourful and not informative enough. |
The presentation was not with PPt/Prezi, not well-planned, not colourful and not informative enough. |
The presentation was not with PPt/Prezi and was short. |
|
Each of you will have to fill in individually, and I will fill in the second chart evaluating the whole group.
Conclusion
I hope, you enjoyed this task and had a creative practice on Unreal Future and Conditional Type 2.
Thank you for your active participation and your interesting plans, as well as your colourful presentations.
Hopefully, we could have opportunity to manage to have a trip to
London in the future.
