Introduction
Welcome to Production of Broadcasting, Interactive, and Emerging Media!
Today, we will be having the group task in which we can apply the principles you learned in our previous sessions. This will test your knowledge and leadership during and after the execution of your task from the proposal up to post-production. This is not a one-day task, it will require you to allot at least 2 weeks. As part of the evaluation, you will evaluate your group mates based on the rubrics discussed below.
Good luck and enjoy!
Task
30-MINUTE TELEVISION PROGRAM
From scratch, all groups are required to produce a 30-minute television program. No theme will be required but you need to make sure that it will be an education-centered program yet entertaining to your target audiences. Your group will propose a program and line up all the segments. All segments must be original.
Process
PROCESS
- Brainstorm and plan all the materials to be included in the program
- Present the concept and the timetable of the production
- Start shooting and editing all materials for segments
- Consolidate all materials and present the program live.
- All equipment will be provided during the live production.
r
Evaluation
All outputs and presentation will be evaluated. Below are the sample rubrics:
PRESENTATION EVALUATION
|
Areas |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Visual Apperance |
Format is simplistic; visuals are unreadable; visuals are not appropriate for the presentation |
Visuals are adequate but may contain errors; visuals do not greatly enhance the presentation |
Visuals are appropriate; visuals may be difficult to read or interpret |
Visuals are of moderate quality; visuals are readable and easy to understand |
Visuals are excellent and enhance the understanding; visuals are easy to read and interpret |
|
Content |
Presenters do not appear to understand the topic |
Very little depth of information given |
Presenters demonstrate basic understanding of the topic; adequate amount of information given |
Presenters demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic; depth and quality of information enhances the presentation |
Presenters demonstrate an excellent understanding of the topic; quality of information is excellent |
|
Quality of Presentation |
Presentation is inadequate; presenters do not speak clearly and merely read the text; overall presentation is weak and basic |
Presentation is basic; presenters read slides and provide little elaboration; overall presentation meets the basic requirements |
Presentation is good; most slides are read with some elaboration; overall presentation shows some basic insight |
Presentation is well done; presenters speak clearly ; some slides are read; overall presentation presents an appropriate level of understanding |
Presentation is excellent; presenters speak clearly without reading; overall presentation adds to the understanding of the subject. |
|
Areas |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Participation |
Did not participate in group work. |
Sometimes participated in group work. |
Regularly participated in group work. |
|
Communication with Group Members |
Rarely initiated or responded to communication efforts between team members. |
Sometimes initiated or responded to communication efforts between team members. |
Regularly initiated or responded to communication efforts between team members. |
|
Attitude toward assignment |
Regularly demonstrated a negative attitude or disinterest in the project. |
Periodically demonstrated a neutral attitude or disinterest in the project. |
Regularly demonstrated a positive attitude and interest in the project. |
|
Task Focus |
Generally did not stay focused on the project and its related tasks. |
Generally remained focused on the project and its related tasks. |
Remained entirely focused on the project and its related tasks. |
|
Creativity/ Innovation |
Did not contribute creative or innovative ideas to the project. |
Provided some creative or innovative ideas for the project. |
Provided several creative or innovative ideas and led efforts to incorporate those ideas into the class project. |
Conclusion
Each group will be evaluated closed door and provide all the details and observations during their performance. All students will create and submit an individual report and a narrative experience report for the checking of individual learnings and how they resolve all the problems encountered.