Christopher Castillo's 2nd amendment

1: Bare Arms

http://kids.laws.com/second-amendment

The Second Amendment, or Amendment II, of the United States Constitution is the amendment and the section of the Bill of Rights that says that people have the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment and the Bill of Rights were introduced into the United States Constitution by James Madison.

http://www.livescience.com/26485-second-amendment.html

James Madison originally proposed the Second Amendment shortly after the Constitution was officially ratified as a way to provide more power to state militias, which today are considered the National Guard. It was deemed a compromise between Federalists — those who supported the Constitution as it was ratified — and the anti-Federalists — those who supported states having more power. Having just used guns and other arms to ward off the English, the amendment was originally created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against a tyrannical federal government.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kenneth-c-davis/a-right-to-bare-arms-arm-_b_774103.html

Americans have always liked their guns. And some Americans REALLY like their guns. Whether to hunt, protect their homes or defend themselves from a tyrannical government, many Americans believe that the government has no right to restrict their access to firearms. But those who want to minimize gun violence, Congress, and the Courts have thought otherwise.

2: free state of guns:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/09/gun-politics

IT IS a blow for advocates of gun restrictions and, perhaps, democracy across the country. Yesterday John Morse, president of the Colorado state Senate, and Angela Giron, another state senator, were recalled from office for backing a package of gun-control measures in February. The pair, both Democrats, are the first state legislators to lose their jobs in this way in Colorado's history. Across the country only 18 state legislators have ever been recalled. (The tool is generally reserved for local officials.)

http://gunseudoraks.com/

Free State Guns and Tactical Weapons, LLC provides quality guns in the Eudora, KS area. Our professional staff is ready to assist you. We ensure the superior service that you deserve – 100% guaranteed.

http://gvsfoundation.org/?gclid=CMrS_amcqbwCFYNQ7AodgxsAdw

We strive to conduct ourselves as a fully transparent nonprofit in order to create a conduit between an individual donor and a Survivor. According to research, ONE out of THREE people in the U.S. knows someone who has fallen victim to gun violence. Your help makes an immediate impact in the lives of individuals and families as they heal.

3: The right to have a gun with license

http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=4451&&PageID=462424&mode=2

An individual who is 21 years of age or older may apply for a license to carry firearms by submitting a completed Application for a Pennsylvania License to Carry Firearms to the sheriff of the county in which they reside or if a resident of a city of the first class, with the chief of police of that city along with the required fee.

http://www.usnews.com/topics/subjects/gun-control-and-gun-rights

The Second Amendment to the Constitution, which concerns the right to bear arms, is always a hot-button issue, especially during election season. Gun rights and gun control groups alike have been lobbying Congress for decades to craft legislation in their respective favors. Twice in the past two years the gun issue has reached the nation’s highest court. In the 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/01/30/bad-news-for-gun-rights-advocates-in-connecticut/

The law, which Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed last April after months of negotiations in the legislature, was not entirely written “with the utmost clarity,” U.S. District Judge Alfred Covello said in his 47-page decision. Still, several provisions are “not impermissibly vague in all of their applications and, therefore, the challenged portions of the legislation are not unconstitutionally vague.”