Introduction
Abnia Luciano
1/21/14
Technology/Design
Unit 3 Lesson 3
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
My summary
We have the right to have our privacy in our house so no one can search anything in our house.
OVERARCHING THEMES that relate to My amendment.
Because the Bill of Rights did not initially apply to the states, and federal criminal investigations were less common in the first century of the nation's history, there is little significant case law for the Fourth Amendment before the 20th century.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Task
Abnia Luciano
1/30/14
804
Technology/Design
4th Amendment
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread964380/pg1
A judge has ruled that the NYPD's controversial use of the stop-and-frisk tactic violated the rights of thousands of New Yorkers, The New York Times reports. Judge Shira Scheindlin's decision Monday called for a federal monitor to watch over the police department to ensure cops are in compliance with the constitution.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/11/06/CNN-Lemon-Stop-And-Frisk
If you question many people in New York City, even some black and Hispanic people they will tell you that on the surface they don’t really have an issue with stop-question-and-frisk. Not the idea of it, at least. Not if the controversial policy was conducted like the occasional, random airport screening.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/203614/stop-and-frisk-violates-the-4th-amendment-rules-judge/
She emphasized what she called the “human toll of unconstitutional stops,” noting that some of the plaintiffs testified that their encounters with the police left them feeling that they did not belong in certain areas of the cities. She characterized each stop as “a demeaning and humiliating experience.”
Process
Abnia Luciano
2/10/14
Technology/Design
What does the 4th amendment do?
What does this mean?
Did they have rights?
Evaluation
Abnia Luciano
2/26/14
Technology/Design
http://bigthink.com/videos/the-first-amendment-in-five-minutes
What should everyone know about the First Amendment?
What everyone should know about the first amendment is that congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Where did this idea come from?
This idea came from because people believe when the original constitution was created there was significant opposition due to the lack of adequate guarantees for civil freedoms
Conclusion
Kari and Abnia
2/28/14
Technology/Design
http://bigthink.com/videos/the-first-amendment-in-five-minutes
What should everyone know about the First Amendment?
What everyone should know about the first amendment is that congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
It’s good
Where did this idea come from?
This idea came from because people believe when the original constitution was created there was significant opposition due to the lack of adequate guarantees for civil freedoms
It’s good
Is really part of the law?
Yes it part of the Bill Of Rights
Need more information